12 research outputs found

    Inferring short-term volatility indicators from Bitcoin blockchain

    Full text link
    In this paper, we study the possibility of inferring early warning indicators (EWIs) for periods of extreme bitcoin price volatility using features obtained from Bitcoin daily transaction graphs. We infer the low-dimensional representations of transaction graphs in the time period from 2012 to 2017 using Bitcoin blockchain, and demonstrate how these representations can be used to predict extreme price volatility events. Our EWI, which is obtained with a non-negative decomposition, contains more predictive information than those obtained with singular value decomposition or scalar value of the total Bitcoin transaction volume

    Multifactor Analysis of Multiscaling in Volatility Return Intervals

    Full text link
    We study the volatility time series of 1137 most traded stocks in the US stock markets for the two-year period 2001-02 and analyze their return intervals τ\tau, which are time intervals between volatilities above a given threshold qq. We explore the probability density function of τ\tau, Pq(τ)P_q(\tau), assuming a stretched exponential function, Pq(τ)∼e−τγP_q(\tau) \sim e^{-\tau^\gamma}. We find that the exponent γ\gamma depends on the threshold in the range between q=1q=1 and 6 standard deviations of the volatility. This finding supports the multiscaling nature of the return interval distribution. To better understand the multiscaling origin, we study how γ\gamma depends on four essential factors, capitalization, risk, number of trades and return. We show that γ\gamma depends on the capitalization, risk and return but almost does not depend on the number of trades. This suggests that γ\gamma relates to the portfolio selection but not on the market activity. To further characterize the multiscaling of individual stocks, we fit the moments of τ\tau, μm≡)m>1/m\mu_m \equiv )^m>^{1/m}, in the range of 10≤10010 \le 100 by a power-law, μm∼δ\mu_m \sim ^\delta. The exponent δ\delta is found also to depend on the capitalization, risk and return but not on the number of trades, and its tendency is opposite to that of γ\gamma. Moreover, we show that δ\delta decreases with γ\gamma approximately by a linear relation. The return intervals demonstrate the temporal structure of volatilities and our findings suggest that their multiscaling features may be helpful for portfolio optimization.Comment: 16 pages, 6 figure

    Inference of financial networks using the normalised mutual information rate

    Get PDF
    In this paper we study data from financial markets using an information theory tool that we call the normalised Mutual Information Rate and show how to use it to infer the underlying network structure of interrelations in foreign currency exchange rates and stock indices of 14 countries world-wide and the European Union. We first present the mathematical method and discuss about its computational aspects, and then apply it to artificial data from chaotic dynamics and to correlated random variates. Next, we apply the method to infer the network structure of the financial data. Particularly, we study and reveal the interrelations among the various foreign currency exchange rates and stock indices in two separate networks for which we also perform an analysis to identify their structural properties. Our results show that both are small-world networks sharing similar properties but also having distinct differences in terms of assortativity. Finally, the consistent relationships depicted among the 15 economies are further supported by a discussion from the economics view point

    Impact of bankruptcy through asset portfolios

    No full text
    We investigate the Japanese banking crisis in the late 1990s with a simple network based mathematical model, which allows us to simulate the crisis as well as to obtain new perspective through analytic solution of our network model. We effectively identify the actual bankrupted banks and the robustness of the banking system using a simulation model based on properties of a bi-partite bank-asset network. We show the mean time property and analytical solution of the model revealing aggregate time dynamics of bank asset prices throughout the banking crisis. The results disclose simple but fundamental property of asset growth, instrumental for understanding the bank crisis. We also estimate the selling pressure for each asset type, derived from a Cascading Failure Model (CFM), offering new perspective for investigating the phenomenon of banking crisis

    Impact of bankruptcy through asset portfolios

    No full text

    Comparison between volatility return intervals of the S&P 500 index and two common models

    No full text
    We analyze the S&P 500 index data for the 13-year period, from January 1, 1984 to December 31, 1996, with one data point every 10 min. For this database, we study the distribution and clustering of volatility return intervals, which are defined as the time intervals between successive volatilities above a certain threshold q. We find that the long memory in the volatility leads to a clustering of above-median as well as below-median return intervals. In addition, it turns out that the short return intervals form larger clusters compared to the long return intervals. When comparing the empirical results to the ARMA-FIGARCH and fBm models for volatility, we find that the fBm model predicts scaling better than the ARMA-FIGARCH model, which is consistent with the argument that both ARMA-FIGARCH and fBm capture the long-term dependence in return intervals to a certain extent, but only fBm accounts for the scaling. We perform the Student's t-test to compare the empirical data with the shuffled records, ARMA-FIGARCH and fBm. We analyze separately the clusters of above-median return intervals and the clusters of below-median return intervals for different thresholds q. We find that the empirical data are statistically different from the shuffled data for all thresholds q. Our results also suggest that the ARMA-FIGARCH model is statistically different from the S&P 500 for intermediate q for both above-median and below-median clusters, while fBm is statistically different from S&P 500 for small and large q for above-median clusters and for small q for below-median clusters. Neither model can fully explain the entire regime of q studied. Copyright EDP Sciences/Società Italiana di Fisica/Springer-Verlag 200889.65.Gh Economics; econophysics, financial markets, business and management, 05.45.Tp Time series analysis, 89.75.Da Systems obeying scaling laws,
    corecore